Submodule Vs. Subtree Merging: A Comparison in Git


Git is a version control system that enables developers to collaborate and manage changes in their source code. It is widely used by developers for managing large, complex projects, where multiple people may be working on the same codebase. One of the key features of Git is its ability to manage dependencies and subprojects using two different methods: submodule merging and subtree merging.

Explanation of Git

Git is a distributed version control system that allows developers to track changes made to their code over time. It allows users to create branches, merge changes from different branches, and revert back to previous versions of their project if necessary.

Git also provides features like tagging, which allows users to mark specific versions of their project. Git has become an essential tool for modern software development as it provides a collaborative platform where multiple developers can work together on a project without interfering with each other’s work.

Overview of Submodule and Subtree Merging

Submodule merging and subtree merging are two ways in which dependencies can be managed within Git. Submodule merging involves linking your main project with other independent projects (submodules) that are stored in separate repositories.

These submodules can then be modified independently by their respective teams, but any changes made must be synchronized with the main project manually. On the other hand, subtree merging involves embedding one repository inside another repository as a subdirectory.

This creates a more tightly coupled relationship between the two repositories than submodule merging does. With subtree merging, any changes made within the subdirectory will affect the main repository automatically.

Purpose of Comparison

The purpose of this article is to compare and contrast these two methods for managing dependencies within Git – submodule vs subtree – so that readers can determine which method is best suited for their particular project. We will examine the advantages and disadvantages of each method, discuss their respective use cases, and highlight the key differences between them. By the end of this article, readers should have a clear understanding of when to use submodule merging and when to use subtree merging.

Submodule Merging

Definition and Explanation of Submodule Merging

In Git, a submodule is essentially a repository within a repository. It allows you to keep one or more external repositories as subdirectories in your own project.

When you clone your project, Git will also clone the submodules and track their versions separately from your main repository. Submodule merging is the process of incorporating changes from the external repository into your main project.

When you want to update the submodule, you must navigate to its directory and pull the changes, then commit those changes in the main project. This means that each submodule has its own history and can be managed independently.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Submodule Merging

One advantage of using submodules is that it allows for better organization of code. Large projects can easily become unwieldy if all code is stored in one repository.

By using submodules, each component can have its own separate repository with clear version control. However, submodule merging also has some disadvantages.

One challenge is that it requires more effort to set up than subtree merging due to the additional steps needed for managing multiple repositories. Additionally, if not properly managed, it can lead to version conflicts and merge issues.

Use Cases for Submodule Merging

Submodule merging is useful when working on large projects with multiple interdependent components or when collaborating with different teams across multiple repositories. For example, a web application with front-end and back-end components could utilize submodules for better organization of code.

Another use case could be when working on open source projects where some modules may not belong to the same organization or team but are still required as dependencies in a larger system. Overall, submodule merging can be an effective way of managing complex projects with multiple dependencies by keeping each component organized and independently maintained within Git.

Subtree Merging

Definition and Explanation of Subtree Merging

Subtree merging is a feature in Git that enables you to merge a specific directory from one repository into another repository. With subtree merging, you can maintain a separate repository for a project and include it as a subdirectory in another project’s repository. When you use subtree merging, the source directory is imported into your destination directory as a subdirectory.

The entire history of the source directory is included in the subdirectory, which means that you can see all of the changes made to the source code since it was created. This provides complete transparency when working on larger projects with multiple contributors.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Subtree Merging

One advantage of subtree merging is that it allows for easy integration between two repositories while maintaining their independence. This can be useful if you have two projects that depend on each other but are developed and maintained separately.

By using subtree merging, you can keep each project’s history separate while also sharing common code. However, one disadvantage of subtree merging is that it can be complex to set up and maintain, especially when dealing with large repositories or frequent updates.

It requires careful planning and execution to ensure that changes made in one repository do not interfere with changes made in another. Another potential disadvantage is that if there are conflicts during the merge process, they may be difficult to resolve due to the complex nature of subtree merges.

Use Cases for Subtree Merging

Subtree merging can be useful in many situations where two repositories need to be merged together while maintaining their own identity. For example, if you have an open source library that is used by multiple projects, but each project has its own specific needs or modifications for your library codebase. By using subtree merges instead of full merges between repositories, developers get the benefits of code sharing, while maintaining autonomy to make changes to the library in their own projects.

Additionally, subtree merges can be helpful for integrating different sub-teams working on different parts of a project. Subtree merging also provides a way to separate concerns within a project.

For example, if you have a web application consisting of a front-end and back-end repository. Subtree merging allows each repository’s codebase to remain separate for easier development and maintenance, while allowing them to be integrated into one application during deployment.

Comparison between the Two Methods

Git is a powerful tool for managing code changes, but choosing the right method for merging subprojects can be challenging. Submodule and subtree merging are two popular options, but they differ in functionality, workflow, and maintenance requirements.

Differences in Functionality

Submodules and subtrees have different purposes and use cases. Submodules allow you to include another Git repository as a subdirectory within your project.

You can then reference specific versions of the submodule in your main project as a dependency. This allows you to keep the history of each project separate while still being able to use them together.

Subtree merging, on the other hand, allows you to merge an entire external repository into a subdirectory of your main project’s repository. Unlike submodules, subtree merges do not need to maintain separate histories or repositories.

Differences in Workflow

The workflow for using submodules is more complex than for subtree merges. With submodules, you must initialize and update each submodule separately from your main repository.

This means that when you clone your main repository onto another machine or share it with other developers, they must also initialize and update each submodule separately. In contrast, subtree merges are simpler to use because they require just one command: git merge -s ours –no-commit .

This command fetches changes from an external repository into a new branch within your main repository. You can then merge these changes into your working branch with git merge .

Differences in Maintenance

Maintenance requirements for submodules are more complicated than those of subtree merges because each submodule has its own Git repository with its own history. This means that updates must be made independently within each submodule before being updated in the primary repo.

Subtree merges only require one repo with all changes happening within it; this makes them easier to maintain than submodules. Any updates or changes made to the external repository will be visible within the main repository, without needing to update any separate repos.

Overall, both submodule and subtree merging have their own advantages and disadvantages. The best choice for your project will depend on your specific needs and use cases.

While subtree merges may be simpler, submodules offer more control over dependencies and versioning. It is important to consider these differences in functionality, workflow, and maintenance when making a decision.


The decision between using submodule merging and subtree merging ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of your project. Both methods have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, with subtree merging being a more straightforward approach that is easier to use but can be more challenging to maintain in the long run, while submodule merging offers greater flexibility and control but requires more effort to set up and maintain. When deciding which method to use, it’s essential to consider factors such as project size, team size, workflow requirements, maintenance needs, and personal preferences.

Generally speaking, if you’re working on a larger project with multiple teams collaborating on several subprojects or modules that need to be updated independently of each other, submodule merging may be a better choice. On the other hand, if you’re working on a smaller project with simpler dependencies or want an easier-to-use approach without many complications in maintenance or updates over time then subtree merging might suit your needs best.

Ultimately both methods offer significant benefits when it comes to managing complex Git workflows efficiently. However, it’s essential to weigh these advantages against the limitations of each method before choosing which one is best suited for your particular project needs.

Overall we can say that Git has made tremendous strides in helping developers manage their codebases effectively using different merge strategies like submodule vs subtree mergings. Different projects require different approaches when it comes to handling various Git workflows effectively; therefore opting for either of these methods should depend entirely upon whether you prefer flexibility or simplicity when updating sub-projects/modules over time while keeping track of changes efficiently across all branches!

Related Articles