The Art of Naming: Selecting Appropriate Names for PostgreSQL Database Objects


Definition of PostgreSQL Database Objects

PostgreSQL is a popular and powerful open-source relational database management system. It provides us with numerous database objects that we can use to store, manipulate, and retrieve data from our databases.

These objects include tables, columns, indexes, views, sequences, constraints (e.g., primary keys, foreign keys), and more. Each of these objects has its unique properties that we need to consider when designing and implementing our databases.

However, one crucial aspect that many people overlook is naming them appropriately. We must provide meaningful names to these objects to make it easier for us and other developers to understand the purpose they serve.

Importance of Naming Database Objects Appropriately

Naming database objects appropriately is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it makes it easier for us as developers to understand the structure of our databases at a glance.

Secondly, it makes code maintenance more manageable as it reduces the likelihood of errors resulting from misidentifying an object or using an incorrect name. Thirdly, well-named database objects make collaboration on projects much smoother.

This benefit becomes even more critical in large teams when multiple developers need to work on different parts of a project simultaneously. Proper naming conventions ensure that everyone can understand what each object does without needing detailed explanations from their colleagues.

Purpose of the Article

The primary purpose of this article is to discuss best practices for naming PostgreSQL database objects effectively. It will provide guidelines on why choosing appropriate names matters and how we can achieve this goal across different kinds of database objects such as tables, columns indexes among others. By following these recommendations provided here in detail throughout this article when selecting names for your PostgreSQL database objects would lead you towards creating an easily understood database structure with consistency being key in all naming efforts.

General Naming Conventions for PostgreSQL Database Objects

The art of naming PostgreSQL database objects is all about standardization, clarity, and consistency. By adopting general naming conventions for your database objects, it becomes easier to navigate, manage and modify the database structures. This section explores some of the best practices that you can use to name your PostgreSQL database objects.

Length and Character limitations

PostgreSQL imposes a limit on the length of names used for tables, columns, indexes, views and other schema objects. The maximum length depends on whether or not you use multi-byte characters in your naming conventions.

In general, it is advisable to keep the name lengths within 63 characters or less. Shorter names make it easier to read SQL statements without having to horizontally scroll on the screen.

Furthermore, avoid using special characters such as punctuation marks as they are likely to cause issues when writing SQL statements or scripts that manipulate data in the tables. Only use underscore (_), hyphen (-), alphanumeric and numeric characters in your naming conventions.

Use of underscores and hyphens

When it comes to spacing between words in table names or column names, there are two common approaches: underscores (_) and hyphens (-). Using an underscore is often referred to as snake_case while using a hyphen is called kebab-case. Both approaches are acceptable but choose one approach and be consistent throughout your entire project.

For example; if you decide to use snake_case convention for all table names then `customer_orders` would be appropriate instead of `customer-orders`. However note that there exist debate regarding which method should be used as different communities prefer one over another for their own reasons based on readability concerns.

Use of CamelCase or snake_case

CamelCase convention involves capitalizing each letter at word breaks except for the first letter which remains lowercase – the first letter of the first word is also capitalized. This naming convention is commonly used for programming languages and is useful for distinguishing between multi-worded names.

For example, instead of using underscores in column names such as `order_id`, you can use CamelCase to obtain `orderId`. Note that while this may make it easier to read, it requires effort to type and can be cumbersome to work with.

Avoiding Reserved Words

PostgreSQL has certain reserved words that must not be used as object names. These words have been designated specific meanings and cannot be used as table or column identifiers. Examples of reserved words include SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, CREATE etc.

To avoid confusion when writing SQL queries or scripts, avoid naming columns or tables after reserved keywords. You can still use these keywords in your SQL statements by enclosing them in double quotes but this is discouraged since it makes your SQL statements less readable and harder to debug.

By following these simple guidelines you will create a database schema that is uniform across all levels. A standardized schema makes it simpler for developers from different teams or even organizations to collaborate on projects without affecting the existing infrastructure of a project.

Naming Tables in PostgreSQL Databases

Singular vs Plural Table Names

When it comes to naming tables in a PostgreSQL database, there are two main approaches: using singular names or using plural names. While there is no correct approach, it is important to be consistent throughout the entire database to prevent confusion. Some people prefer to use singular table names for their databases.

This approach can make the code more readable and easier to understand as each table represents a single entity. However, this can lead to confusion when working with queries that involve multiple items of the same type.

For example, if we have a table named “book” and another table named “author”, querying all books written by an author becomes ambiguous. On the other hand, using plural table names can help alleviate some of these issues.

In this approach, each table represents a collection of entities rather than a single instance. Therefore, if we have a table named “books” and another named “authors”, queries become more intuitive as we are working with collections rather than individual instances.

Descriptive Table Names

Descriptive table names play an important role in making your code easy to read and understand. A well-named table should convey its contents clearly without ambiguity. When choosing descriptive names for tables in your PostgreSQL database, it’s essential to think about what the data will represent and how it will relate to other tables in the database schema.

A useful tip is to use domain-specific terminology that users familiar with that particular field would instantly recognize. For example, consider an e-commerce site selling shoes: instead of calling your primary product database “products,” you could call it “shoes.” This simple change makes it easier for developers (especially those new to your project) who may not be familiar with your codebase may easily understand which tables are storing information about shoes rather than other types of products.

Prefixes and Suffixes for Table Names

Prefixes and suffixes can be used to group tables by function or category, making it easier to navigate through your database schema. For example, if you have several tables related to users, you can prefix them all with “user_” to group them together.

Similarly, if you have several tables related to orders, you could use the prefix “order_”. The goal is to make it easier for developers who are working on the same project or team members who need to navigate the database schema frequently.

It’s important not to overuse prefixes and suffixes as your codebase could become cluttered and challenging to read. Stick with a few well-chosen prefixes and suffixes that fit the overall structure of the database schema.

Descriptive column names

One of the most important aspects of creating a well-structured PostgreSQL database is naming columns in a way that accurately describes their purpose. This becomes especially critical when there are many tables and columns to manage.

When naming columns, it is essential to use descriptive names that are meaningful to all team members working on the project. For example, if you were building a database for an online clothing store, it might be tempting to name your columns something like “P1”, “P2”, or “P3” for product ID numbers.

However, this naming convention is not descriptive or intuitive and can lead to confusion among team members who aren’t familiar with the project. Instead, consider using a descriptive name such as “product_id” or “item_code” that clearly defines what the column represents.

Avoiding abbreviations and acronyms

While abbreviations and acronyms can save time in typing code, they can also cause confusion among team members who are tasked with maintaining the database after you’ve moved on from the project. Abbreviations and acronyms should only be used when they are widely recognized and accepted within your industry. For example, if you were building a database for a healthcare organization, it may be appropriate to use an acronym like MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging).

However, avoid using obscure or industry-specific jargon that only your team members might understand. Instead of using vague abbreviations like “prod_desc” for product description or “cust_id” for customer ID number; use full words like “description” and “customer_id”.

Consistency in naming across tables

Maintaining consistency across all tables in your PostgreSQL database is essential for ease-of-use by all parties involved in handling the data stored within them. Consistency saves time by reducing confusion about which column is which and which table a column belongs to. One way to maintain consistency is by using a naming convention that is consistent across tables.

For example, if you use “product_id” in one table, it’s best practice to use the same name in all other tables where there is a need for that column. This makes it easier for developers and analysts to understand the relationships between the tables within the database.

Another way to maintain consistency is by limiting abbreviations and acronyms, as previously mentioned earlier in this article. Using full words instead of abbreviations ensures that everyone on your team understands what each column represents across all tables.

Naming conventions are essential components of PostgreSQL database design because they facilitate communication among team members and improve efficiency when managing large databases. By adopting descriptive names, avoiding abbreviations or acronyms wherever possible, and maintaining consistency across all tables; you can create a well-structured database that is easy for your team members to understand and work with over time.

Naming Constraints in PostgreSQL Tables

Definition of constraints

Constraints are rules that guarantee the accuracy and consistency of data in a PostgreSQL database. They are used to enforce business rules or data integrity by limiting the type of information that can be inserted into a specific table.

Constraints are added to tables during their creation, and they can also be added later on using an ALTER TABLE statement. PostgreSQL constraints come in several types, including primary keys, foreign keys, unique constraints, and check constraints.

Primary keys uniquely identify each row in a table, while foreign keys create links between tables by referencing their primary key columns. Unique constraints ensure that all values entered into a column are distinct from each other, while check constraints validate data against specific conditions.

Naming conventions for primary keys, foreign keys, unique constraints, check constraints

Naming conventions for PostgreSQL database object constraints should follow certain guidelines to ensure consistency and ease of understanding for other developers who may access the database later on. For primary key naming conventions, it is recommended to use the format “pk_tablename”.

This makes it clear that this is a primary key constraint for the specified table. For example: “pk_customers”.

For foreign key naming conventions, use “fk_tablename_columnname” as the format. This makes it clear which table and column this constraint is referencing.

For example: “fk_orders_customerid”. Unique constraint naming conventions should use the format “uq_tablename_columnname”.

This clearly shows which column has a unique constraint applied to it within a specific table. For instance: “uq_customers_email”.

Check constraint names should begin with either “chk_” or “ck_”. The latter is shorter and more concise but both adhere to regular naming conventions in PostgreSQL databases.

These guidelines provide consistency for all objects within your PostgreSQL database schema without sacrificing readability or understandability. It is important to follow these conventions to ensure that your database is easily maintained and updated, even if the original developers of the schema are no longer present.

Naming Indexes in PostgreSQL Tables

Definition of indexes

Indexes are database objects used to improve query performance in PostgreSQL databases. By indexing a column or group of columns within a table, the database can more easily and quickly locate specific data when requested.

This is done by creating a separate object that contains the indexed values and their corresponding pointers to the table data. Although indexes can improve query performance, they also add overhead to the database’s storage and maintenance requirements, so it is important to only create them when necessary.

Naming conventions for indexes

When naming indexes in PostgreSQL databases, it is important to follow consistent naming conventions for ease of use and maintenance. Some common naming conventions for indexes include: – Using the name of the table or column being indexed as a prefix

– Including information about the type of index (e.g., btree, hash) as a suffix – Including information about any additional options specified when creating the index (e.g., unique)

For example, if we have a table called “employees” with columns “employee_id” and “last_name” and we want to create an index on “last_name”, we could name it “employees_last_name_idx”. This name includes both the name of the table (“employees”) and the indexed column (“last_name”), as well as indicating that it is an index (“idx”).

It is also important to avoid using reserved words or characters when naming indexes. Postgres automatically creates an index using default settings whenever appropriate e.g Primary Keys etc.

The Importance of Naming Conventions for Indexes

Consistent naming conventions for indexes in PostgreSQL databases can greatly improve maintainability and ease-of-use. By following established patterns for naming objects within your database schema, other developers will be able to quickly understand how objects relate to one another without having to spend time deciphering complex naming schemes. Additionally, consistent naming conventions for indexes can make it easier to identify and troubleshoot performance issues within the database.

Naming Views in PostgreSQL Databases

Definition of views

A view is a virtual table that does not store any data by itself, but instead retrieves data from other tables in the database. Views can be used for various purposes such as simplifying complex queries, providing a layer of abstraction between the user and data, and restricting access to sensitive data. A view is created by defining a SELECT statement that retrieves data from one or more tables.

Descriptive view names

When naming views in PostgreSQL databases, it is essential to use descriptive and meaningful names that accurately reflect the purpose of the view. The name should provide an indication of what the view does, what data it provides, or what problem it solves.

Avoid using generic or vague names like “View1” or “Table2”. These types of names do not provide any useful information about the contents or purpose of the view.

Prefixes and suffixes for view names

To further help distinguish views from tables in PostgreSQL databases, you can use prefixes or suffixes when naming them. For example, you could prefix all your views with “vw_”, such as “vw_customer_orders”.

Alternatively, you could suffix all your views with “_view”, such as “customer_orders_view”. This makes it easier to identify which objects are views within a database with many tables and views.


Selecting appropriate names for PostgreSQL database objects is crucial to ensure efficient usage and understanding of your database structure. Using consistent naming conventions throughout your database will make it easier for other developers to understand your code and reduce potential errors due to confusion over different naming schemes. By following these guidelines when naming your PostgreSQL database objects – length limitations; avoiding reserved words; using underscores/hyphens; consistency; singular vs plural table names; descriptive column names; using descriptive view names; and prefixes and suffixes for table and view names – you’ll ensure that your database is well-organized, easy to understand, and a pleasure to work with.

Related Articles